When many people think about "comic books," they are reminded of the 1960's
Batman TV series, and expect comic
books to still be populated by cartoonish characters with appeal primarily for children. But comic books have changed. Their
audience now primarily consists of teenagers and young adults; the stories and art have likewise matured. But despite these
changes the role of women in comic books has not greatly improved. They are still often depicted in a stereotypical and discriminatory
fashion. Female characters are frequently mere beautiful objects rather than full-fledged characters.
The majority of comic books continue to feature "superheroes" and other characters with appeal for a male audience. Few
feature female characters, although the roles available for women have expanded. Lois Lane is no longer identified as "Superman's
girlfriend." She is a self-reliant reporter more interested in her work than Clark Kent's secret identity; when he proposed
to her in 1990 she initially turned him down. But many comic books appear to feature women only so that their revealing costumes
will raise sales. Even intelligent or powerful women do not seem to have the sense to fully clothes themselves; their value
is ornamental. Based on many female characters' "endowment," it is difficult to believe that they can stand up, much less
fly.
The two major comic book publishers, Marvel and DC, are not above this trend. Progress has been made. DC's President is
a woman, Jenette Kahn. But innovation and rapid change have been lacking. According to the trade publication Advance Comics,
only seven out of their nearly two hundred April 1993 releases star women. Two are based on the Barbie fashion toys; Silver
Sable features a female mercenary who fights crime - in a skin-tight mirrored costume; Black Canary features another
superhero, who patrols the streets wearing fishnet stockings. Women may no longer be overtly placed in subservient roles in
comic books, but the message conveyed by the art about the appearance of women, idealized and impractical, belies this improvement.
Some of the smaller "independent" publishers that arose in the 1980's have used the graphic medium to tell stories with
less physical and more mental interaction. But many have relied upon sex to sell their publications. Titles such as Femforce
and Vampirella feature women wearing what is certainly the minimal amount of clothing that permits them (the comic
books) to be sold to minors. Some comic books even feature explicit pornography. Ironically, such "underground" comic books
have often been the only titles to address standards of beauty for women in society and the medium. Omaha the Cat Dancer,
one of the most acclaimed comic books of the 1980's, is a soap opera that focuses on the life of an erotic dancer and the
implications of her work. The title depicts graphic sex - but it is in fact written by a woman, Kate Worley.
But most comic books do not address the implications of their depiction of women. Virtually every male character wears
a costume that covers him from neck to foot, but it is a rare female character who does not have lots of flesh exposed, be
it bare legs, a plunging neckline, or high-cut thighs. Wonder Woman is one of the most progressive comic books currently
on the market. However, her costume, ostensibly armor, hardly offers protection against most weapons or even inclement weather.
Women often assert their independence by wearing costumes that make them look more like a sexual dominatrix than a mature
adult. Susan Richards, the Fantastic Four's Invisible Woman, along with a once-matronly personality, recently traded
in a full bodysuit for a low-cut tank top, hip boots, and a bare midriff - a costume that is itself almost invisible.
Comic books have long been biased towards characters of WASPish appearance; women have been no exception. Races with subtle
physical distinctions, such as Asian and Hispanic, are particularly rare, although this may perhaps be due to the limitations
of the medium. But when a woman is not white, she is most likely to be green (the She-Hulk), furry (the feline Tigra), or
not human (the alien princess Starfire). Women of color often seem to be the women most likely to have a full-body costume,
while Asian women often possess the most revealing outfits. These two distinctions can only further perverse beliefs about
what types of the female body are worth displaying (as well as the very idea that it should be displayed). Comic books are
only now beginning to accept that women can differ in appearance from the Caucasian norm without being inherently repugnant
or seductive.
But it is too simplistic to dismiss contemporary comic books as sexist or prejudiced. Not all artists, writers, and publishers
have contributed to these trends. Further, "beauty" is more than physical appearance; comic books have often depicted female
characters beautiful in their inner strength. For example, Dorothy Spinner, a disfigured teenage girl, chose to grow up in
the real world with the Doom Patrol rather than living "happily ever after" on a fairy-tale like planet. The human
body - the female body - is not in itself something of which to be ashamed. It is not so much the existence of revealing costumes
that should be a concern but their intention and interpretation. Do the stories and text that accompany the sometimes exaggerated
depiction of women justify the art?